About Weston —September 20, 2018
by MARGARET WIRTENBERG
Are we as a State on a fiscal cliff?
This question will be addressed at an event soon to be presented by the
League of Women Voters of Weston. It will take place on Saturday,
September 29th, from 10:30 a.m. to 12 noon at the Weston Public
Library. Keith Phaneuf, a distinguished reporter for the CT
Mirror, will be the featured speaker.
Mr. Phaneuf’s specialty is state government finances. He is the
author of a comprehensive series of articles entitled “A Legacy of
Debt: Connecticut Standing on its own Fiscal Cliff.”
Interested citizens from Easton, Redding, and other area towns, as well
as from Weston, are invited to attend. For those who cannot be
there the LWV will be recording the event, for viewing online soon
It has taken many decades for Connecticut’s fiscal situation to reach
its present dire status. And to warrant the elegantly posed title
of this event: “Connecticut’s Fiscal Challenges, Decades in the
Making: A Look Back, A Look Forward.”
Although the Legislature is not presently in session, and the Governor
is not running for re-election, at least one governmental entity is hard
at work on these issues.
It is the Pension Sustainability Commission, meeting twice a
month. Its charge? To study the feasibility of placing State
capital assets in a “Trust” that would maximize them for the sole
benefit of the State pension system. And to recommend which
capital assets should be included.
What do Weston, Easton, and Redding share besides the Aspetuck
News? And besides being the three towns in the 135th House
district? All are going to be affected by Connecticut’s fiscal
crisis and its ultimate resolution.
Weston may be in a more advantageous position than its neighbors with
respect to these issues, though. I say this because we are
embarking on the once per decade process of updating our Town Plan of
Conservation and Development right now. Redding must do so soon, and
Easton has a draft currently being reviewed. Those communities
will be facing major challenges relating to land use, as I see it.
Redding is responsible for the Gilbert & Bennett site
developments. Easton is confronting a pretty much impossible task,
how to create a center where not only hasn’t there been one, but many
in town don’t want one. As least as far as I can tell from reading
reports in the Aspetuck News, that is.
Westonites like to be in the woods, surrounded by natural beauty.
Thanks to the purchase of development rights to the Nature Conservancy’s
Devil’s Den for an open space price years ago, we have a sense of
ownership, or at least shared ownership, of the 1600 or so acres of this
treasure that are in Weston.
Unlike Redding, Weston cannot claim Mark Twain as a former
resident. But one of his many memorable quotes bespeaks our good
fortune in having a Town government that recognizes the need for a
comprehensive approach to development of the new Town Plan: “The
secret of getting ahead is getting started.”
ARTIST'S IMPRESSION OF HOW THE NORFIELD OAK TREE LOOKS NOW AFTER MAKING IT SOMEWHAT SAFER FOR SCHOOL BUS.
WILL THE SCHOOL BUS STILL COME TO A STOP? ACTUALLY, IT SHOULD
WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A CHILD GETTING ON OR OFF - JUST TO BE
Delivery trucks still must cross the yellow line (this was a truck from a
party-supply place); and on the right, coming down the hill
(westbound) the open wound of the missing mast.
INQUIRING MINDS WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF HIS POWERS EXTEND TO TRAFFIC CONTROL??? Answer: No, but the Police Commission/Police Chief is the last word. Planning Law case
- "Causby's Chickens" rule apply? (Chickens [The Tree] were there before the
airport [2016 traffic].) And don't forget the CT General Statutes ("C.G.A.") on the subject of Town Trees...
The Tree Warden states that it is in fine if not great shape but presents a traffic hazard - is it in his purview (link to C.G.A.) to order the removal of this tree for that reason? Well, maybe it is and maybe it isn't...he's in charge of the tree.
R E E W A R D E N P U B L I
C H E A R I N G A U G U S
T 5 , 1 9 9 8 IT AIN'T OVER 'TIL ITS OVER DEPARTMENT: OAK TREE ON NORFIELD ROAD THREATENED AGAIN?
For those who may remember, and for those who weren't around, including
the Town Administrator, who reported at the Board of Selectmen August
2016 that he had read the minutes of Tree Warden public hearing...About
Town spoke up about the matter (having attended all the meetings of the
Board of Selectmen since mid-1991).
Guess what! About Town has it (the Tree Warden Public Hearing) on
videotape (in our archives in the
basement). It is around one hour long and we just watched it - it is a
League of Women Voters of Weston Presents production. Below is a
"play-by-play" of the event - a "picture story" with the pictures being
screen shots! It had been broadcast on the Government Channel (not
run as a local channel then) as a public service from the League of
PUBLIC HEARINGBY TREE WARDENAUGUST 5, 1998
This was a Tree Warden Public Hearing August 5, 1998 in the Town Hall
Meeting Room. Jean Owens taking minutes. Jim Hoe (l) is the
Tree Warden. Public Works Director Joe Lametta ran the hearing,
calling on "yes" take the tree down group (above). P&Z had
tried to minimize curb cuts during subdivision process and come up with
this plan - which included a condition of approval that the tree be
taken down by the developer. Meanwhile, lawyer for the developer
reports two lots have already been sold. In addition, he points
out that the Town of Weston had turned down an offer to buy the
property. P&Z member sorry they couldn't find another way in
SIX LOT SUBDIVISION WITH WETLANDS AND STEEP SLOPES (SO WHAT ELSE IS NEW?).
Martha Gilson ("First Five" not shown) spoke first, another agreed, then a fellow who
loved the tree testified he
thought two stop signs would work. The next speaker (she is not shown) questioned
why they had to exit onto Norfield in the first place, and
another thought tree slowed people down! The runner proposed speed
bumps and stop signs (he had taken the time to do a time and motion study of a sort) measured the sight lines and couldn't see
any safe possibilities).
AH YES WHAT IS A TREE WORTH? Maybe he was abrupt, but he sure was spot on - destroy a 200 year
old tree for 6 building lots? Not, as we would say in the 21st
century, "The Weston Way." Next - why can't we find a way out?
Why? Most magnificent tree. Save the tree! The next
two speakers picked up on the question. "The tree is worth saving!" said one, and the other
wondered where we'd be if we didn't stand up for the natural environment and spare this tree.
SELECTMAN SHOWS WHY HE GETS ELECTED OVER AND OVER!
"Nobody ever complained before - all of a sudden this is an excuse to
take from the town our heritage" was a BIG applause line!!!
Another nail in the approved subdivision condition's future re: the tree...as this venerable
and always accurate voice stated it had never been a problem before...
AND THEN THE "CUT DOWN THAT TREE" SIDE CAME A CROPPER. OOPS! In response, the unwitting P&Z Chair announced that yes it had
been posted to be cut down a few years ago (no doubt testimony by the
applicant). Neighbor rises to report that it was CL&P who had it
posted, not the town, and implicitly we figure she got her way!!!
Then it was over (total @one hour).
Tree Warden repeats that there
will be a decision in three days. The tree is still standing as of August 2016,
but...Selectmen may be having second thoughts...
For reference, in addition to any other records, there are these "League
Lines" columns published in the FORUM that include references to this
very same tree:
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink" - effort
to get a secret ballot - which was the precursor to the Referendum that
a Charter Revision Commission made more than a decade later... FROM THE LWV OF WESTON WEBSITE: SPECIAL TOWN MEETING, JAN. 9, 2003, WESTON HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM, 8PM
AGENDA 1. Call to order - First Selectman/done - @8:15pm
2. Introduce Head Table - First Selectman/done
3. Nomination and election of Moderator - First Selectman.
Moderator assumes leadership of the balance of the meeting/done.
4. Appoint Parliamentarian (Susan Moch) and identify Registrars of Voters by name and official counters by name/done.
5. Read statutes re Qualifications of voters and penalties for fraudulent voting/done.
6. Segregate non-voters/done.
7. Note that Town Clerk Cynthia Williams is Clerk of the Meeting/Donna Anastasia, Ass't. Town Clerk in this position.
8. Get motion and vote to waive reading of Call/done.
9. Instruct Clerk to enter Call in the minutes of the Meeting/done.
10. Explain votes to be taken, methods of voting, and method of amendments/done.
a. All votes by voice except for the following:
i. If Moderator cannot determine the prevailing side - take immediate standing vote.
ii. If at least seven (7) voters immediately challenge the Moderator's call of the outcome - take immediate standing vote.
iii.If, prior to taking a vote on a motion on the floor, the Meeting
itself upon a motion duly made and seconded, votes to take the vote on
the pending motion by some other
means (i.e. paper ballot).
11. Explain the rules for addressing the meeting/done:
a. Get recognized by the Moderator.
b. Identify yourself by name and street
c. Address remarks or questions to Moderator; be as brief as
possible; don't simply repeat what others have said; avoid
d. Any issues outside the scope of the Call, or not germane to the motion at hand, will be ruled out of order. 12. Any questions about procedure?/LWV of Weston calls for paper ballot,
voice vote taken ("NO" prevails according to Moderator); LWV
Co-President calls for a division of
the house--gets many more than seven voters to join this motion -
standing count not close (precise number to come)--LWV request fails. 13. Brief remarks re First Resolution - First Selectman/done.
14. Discussion and vote/many speakers against, some for--voice vote called "YES"--challenged; standing count not close.
15. Brief remarks re Second Resolution - First Selectman/done.
16. Discussion and vote/speakers equally divided, voice vote "YES" overwhelming--no call for standing count.