C O N S I D E R I N G T H A
T N O T H I N G I
N C O N N E C T I C U T I
S A F F O R D A B L E . . .
DEEDS ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITMENT:
PASSED THE HOUSE WITH ONE STICK REMOVED
But does it really say anything??? Does the bill specifically state the "2 of 3 items" anyplace?
“'...This critical vote by the House of Representatives is
the first step toward enacting reasonable zoning reform in the State of
Connecticut,' said Evonne M. Klein, the state housing commissioner.
'It’s no secret that our state remains one of the most segregated in the
nation. By ensuring our zoning laws better reflect the needs of our
towns and cities, our residents will have greater access to
"Only 20 of Connecticut’s 169 cities and towns allow multi-family
housing, which is defined as three or more units, as a right under their
zoning regulations, two dozen bar it and the rest allow housing of
three or more units by special permit.
"The bill requires zoning regulations to provide for, rather than
encourage, a variety of housing development opportunities to meet local
and regional needs. It eliminates a requirement the regulations be made
to consider the “character” of a district, an ambiguous phrase..."
From the CT MIRROR article 4-25-18.
What is the difference between zoning violations and other illegal activity?
H'mmm...could it be that Democrats don't think the law applies to everyone equally?
From a longer Stamford ADVOCATE article on zoning violations in Stamford, Dec. 9, 2017:
"...Simmons said working on zoning enforcement is one reason she will
run for a third two-year term in 2018. In October she married Republican
state Sen. Art Linares of Westbrook after a very public proposal - he
took out a full-page ad in the Stamford Advocate that read, 'Dear
Caroline, Will you marry me?'
"Simmons said she will maintain her Stamford apartment and continue to serve the 144th District.
"'I know other cities are facing zoning violations as well, but I think
because of increasing growth in Stamford and the increasing number of
people moving here, it’s a bigger challenge'.”
LOW-HANGING FRUIT DEPT.: That would be recycling - ideas and mandates...affordable housing, (8-30g) too?
2018 SESSION GETS ROLLING...https://www.cga.ct.gov/2018/TOB/h/pdf/2018HB-05045-R00-HB.pdf
Are they contradicting last year's "simplification" of interpretation of
non-conformity? Is the C.G.A. being asked to say, for example,
Cobb's Mill Inn may have a problem if there is no attempt to re-open it
as a restaurant?
We will be following this "Fair Housing" change to statutes on zoning
closely. Too early to tell what it might bring in JF format,
But more important is this - FYI sub-section (a) is the traditional zoning language - our reading
is much of what Weston's Subdivision Regulations say regarding
protections to wells and septics are now being integrated into Zoning
THE 2017 SESSION'S HOUSING BILLS
AN EFFORT TO ENGAGE IN BIPARTISAN LEGISLATING?
Sen. Hwang on Housing Committee; Sen. Slossberg, thoughtful legislator, says veto "shortsighted."
Full article from CT MIRROR here:
"Malloy’s veto drew mixed reactions from legislators. Sen. Gayle
Slossberg, D-Milford, one of the bill’s major advocates, called it
“'Although the legislature clearly heard our voices, the governor
clearly could not,' she wrote on Facebook. "'His veto action will
undermine our efforts and those across the state to encourage
communities to embrace affordable housing in a thoughtful way'.”
Veto statement by Governor: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/archives/entry/malloy_vetoes_changes_to_affordable_housing_law/
Public Act No. 17-170 - https://www.cga.ct.gov/2017/act/pa/2017PA-00170-R00HB-06880-PA.htm
We asked, was this bill for real? Will the Governor sign it prior to hell freezing over?
As it progressed this Session: https://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=HB06880&which_year=2017
Property Rounds: Underwater homes a stubborn problem
Stamford ADVOCATE, June 14, 2017
HOUSING CHOICE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH...
A R T N E R S H I P F O R S T R O N
G C O M M U N I T I E S P A N E L ,
F E B . 2 7 , 2 0 1 7
MARKET HOUSING STUDY FROM HARVARD
- Regulations increase the price of housing.
- People are moving because of price of housing now.
- Comment from audience: Taxes higher in North Carolina. Very affordable in CT!!! But regs are uniform.
- Huge variation among local towns but his study didn't examine this issue that way.
SUBURBAN STRATEGY OR DENSITY STRATEGY: First question for panel.
Are we a victim of our own success?
- Cities cannot support - in free-fall (slow growth)
- Huge challenge. Wealth generation.
- Growth policy the issue.
- Cost of living here by comparison to other parts of the country. Renting v. ownership.
- Coldwell doing housing strategy in WestCOG.
- U.I. - infrastructure - density important. Electricity and natural gas.
- Non-profit is a growth industry.
- Bought her first house recently but couldn't afford to many
communities (New Haven). Banks didn't want to lend because it was a
Property Tax system that supports enrollment the answer?
- Coldwell guy on a P&Z story - time allowed for waiting around
on subdivision process. Zoning Commission are varied by who is on them.
- Coldwell guy thinks cost - Joe asks is it is the regs?
- What can we do right now? Hundred different things driving people away.
- Density brings lower income? (McGee).
- "Main Street" downtowns to increase density is an idea.
- Danbury study; planning tools to calculate how many school children rentals produce?
- 26 per acre density housing can't get financing. Need higher density???
- Financial situation of the elderly makes for a broader conversation.
- Traffic slowing growth.
- Developers building to the market
- High wage and low wage jobs growing.
- Digital talent needed and CT not doing this.
- Do we change tax structure to help pay off student debt? (5 yrs. 50% of debt)
- Do businesses follow talent...incentivized??? If you want to make it you have to be mobile.
- REGIONAL SOLUTION. Target behavior directly.
- 8-30g - Coldwell guy comment: Attitudes.
- Retraining not a go - from Hartford. Homeowner. CT set up for tenants not landlords.
- Multi-family industry: No help for the middle (Windsor) likes
suburbs. Grown children leave because they want to earn $$. People
don't stay on more than a few years.
- Litigation environment. Comprehensive plan. Education equity. New Haven. A stepchild to Boston.
HUD releases vouchers for residents of Thames River Apartments
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on Monday
released $1.28 million to fund housing vouchers and relocate the
residents of the troubled Thames River Apartments...
Story in full: http://www.theday.com/local-news/20171127/hud-releases-vouchers-for-residents-of-thames-river-apartments
OCT. 2017 - LATEST: http://www.theday.com/local-news/20171004/hud-approves-disposition-of-thames-river-apartments
New London: http://www.theday.com/local/20170623/report-indicates-little-value-for-crystal-avenue-site
APARTMENT TOWERS FOR PUBLIC HOUSING...NOT A HAPPY HISTORY. (R) Data from news report some years ago.
Consider the recent fire case of London apartment block; Pruitt-Igoe in St. Louis. Father Panik Village...we'd bet NLHA first three projects are high rises.
Affordable housing and the city's future
Brian Lockhart, CT POST
Published 1:21 am, Monday, September 23, 2013
BRIDGEPORT -- It's only 74 mixed-income rental units on 2.5 acres in the
state's largest city, population 146,000, but it could affect the
future of Bridgeport.
"It's a small site. We're not trying to overwhelm it," Sharon Lee, the
Bridgeport Housing Authority's development manager, told the crowd
gathered recently in Shiloh Baptist Church.
They were there to learn about the authority's latest proposal for the
vacant land at 375 Main St., off lower Broad Street by the train
tracks. As Lee said, it's a small site. But she and Sharon
Ebert, the authority's director of planning and development, also made
it clear Wednesday their agency's reputation and future city
redevelopment are riding on what they build on those 2.5 acres.
It's the first of several private/public partnerships the authority is
pursuing to replace its aging, 2,600-unit housing stock with the
mixed-income model and -- they hope -- ultimately change perceptions
about those properties and who moves in. Lee said Bridgeport is
the only city in Connecticut that has not remade its public housing...read story in full at CT POST.
FROM CT EXPERT ON HOUSING/POPULATION CHANGE
SPECIAL SESSION OF ISLAND COUNTY PC - note that the planning process
looks great on paper, but hot topics blow up there even more than in
State of Washington has Counties. Link to Island County Planning Commission: https://www.islandcountywa.gov/Planning/Pages/planningcomm.aspx
Island County memo: https://www.islandcountywa.gov/Planning/Planning%20Commission%20Documents/13114%20-%2011-13-17%20PC%20-%20Staff%20Memo.pdf
OWNERSHIP V. RENTAL HOUSING: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/archives/entry/report_finds_that_connecticuts_housing_market_is_changing_11_30_2017/
SURPRISE! Research show that home ownership favors the non-poor!
From the CT MIRROR: https://ctmirror.org/2017/10/09/gap-between-buying-and-renting-a-home-in-ct-widens/
ZONING AND SPECIAL PERMITS PLUS WHO'S GOT A TRAFFIC STUDY? AND ANOTHER?
"Spot zoning" by any other name? But then, I have never
liked the "Special Permit" process...and the joke of "traffic studies"
is that once you have reached the worst limits on capability of roads
and intersections to accomodate it - who's responsibility to improve the
situation is it???
“...'This is the worst intersection in town and cannot handle any more
traffic — I cannot begin to fathom the tremendous delays that a housing
development would have on that already horrific and dangerous
intersection' noted one comment from Public Hearing.”
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE LINKING POVERTY AND HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS - NOT THE WHOLE STORY